For decades there was only 1 reputable solution to store information on your personal computer – working with a hard drive (HDD). However, this sort of technology is presently demonstrating it’s age – hard disks are really noisy and sluggish; they’re power–hungry and are likely to create a lot of warmth for the duration of serious operations.

SSD drives, alternatively, are extremely fast, take in a lot less energy and are also much cooler. They offer a whole new solution to file accessibility and data storage and are years ahead of HDDs with regards to file read/write speed, I/O effectiveness and then energy effectivity. Find out how HDDs fare against the newer SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Because of a revolutionary new method of disk drive functionality, SSD drives enable for faster data accessibility rates. With an SSD, data access times tend to be lower (only 0.1 millisecond).

HDD drives count on spinning disks for data storage applications. Each time a file is being utilized, you have to await the appropriate disk to reach the correct position for the laser to view the data file in question. This results in a typical access speed of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Because of the same radical technique that allows for better access times, it’s also possible to appreciate far better I/O performance with SSD drives. They will accomplish double as many functions throughout a specific time as compared with an HDD drive.

An SSD can handle at least 6000 IO’s per second.

Hard drives deliver slower data access speeds due to the aging file storage space and accessibility technique they are implementing. And in addition they show noticeably reduced random I/O performance compared to SSD drives.

For the duration of our lab tests, HDD drives handled typically 400 IO operations per second.

3. Reliability

SSD drives are made to include as fewer rotating elements as is possible. They use a similar technique like the one utilized in flash drives and are generally much more reliable in comparison to standard HDD drives.

SSDs provide an average failure rate of 0.5%.

Since we have already documented, HDD drives make use of spinning hard disks. And something that employs many moving elements for extented time periods is at risk of failing.

HDD drives’ normal rate of failing can vary among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

SSD drives operate almost soundlessly; they don’t create surplus warmth; they don’t involve more air conditioning options and also use up considerably less energy.

Lab tests have demostrated that the average electrical power usage of an SSD drive is amongst 2 and 5 watts.

HDD drives can be well known for getting noisy; they are at risk from overheating and if there are several hard drives within a web server, you will need a further cooling system only for them.

In general, HDDs consume somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

The swifter the data accessibility rate is, the swifter the file calls will be treated. Consequently the CPU will not have to hold resources waiting for the SSD to respond back.

The regular I/O wait for SSD drives is barely 1%.

By using an HDD, you have to devote time anticipating the outcomes of your data query. Because of this the CPU will continue to be idle for more time, expecting the HDD to react.

The normal I/O delay for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

In real life, SSDs function as perfectly as they did in the course of the tests. We ran a full platform data backup on one of our own production servers. Through the backup process, the standard service time for I/O queries was indeed below 20 ms.

With the exact same server, but this time furnished with HDDs, the outcome were completely different. The normal service time for an I/O call changed in between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Referring to backups and SSDs – we have found a significant development in the backup speed since we moved to SSDs. Right now, a common web server back–up will take only 6 hours.

On the flip side, with a hosting server with HDD drives, an identical data backup may take three or four times as long to complete. A complete backup of an HDD–powered server normally takes 20 to 24 hours.

To be able to right away enhance the functionality of your web sites without the need to alter any kind of code, an SSD–operated hosting service will be a very good choice. Look at RnA Hosting Co’s Linux cloud website hosting packages and additionally the Linux VPS servers – our solutions feature really fast SSD drives and can be found at good prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • All of our Virtual Private Servers provide no setup costs and operate in a stable network delivering 99.9% of uptime. Full root/administrator access to the server guaranteed.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Have a look at our rates and select the most suitable Virtual Private Server for your dynamic sites. You’ll be able to migrate to a more advanced VPS configuration with simply a mouse click.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • You can get in contact with us day and night by email or by making use of our really–fast ticketing system. Our company offers a 1–hour response time warranty.